|
III. Findings and Recommendations of
the Task Force
D. Findings and Recommendations From the Subcommittee
on Administrators
FINDINGS (Continued)
b. Findings From Interviews with Deans.
- Generally, the Deans displayed a wide range of
attitudes regarding gender equity, with two of eleven
Deans showing little or no awareness of dimensions of
gender equity that concern climate or morale. (See
Appendix E, Report of Deans' Interviews, p. 1)
- Two of eleven Deans seemed to equate gender equity
issues largely with salary inequities. (See Appendix E,
Report of Deans' Interviews, p. 1)
- One Dean out of eleven expressed a target goal of
hiring women for fifty percent of new hires, but he did
not indicate that he had a plan to achieve this goal.
(See Appendix E, Report of Deans' Interviews, p. 1)
- A few Deans reported that, because certain
professions are predominantly male, aggressively
recruiting women in these professions is unlikely to
prove successful in the near future. (See Appendix E,
Report of Deans' Interviews, p. 1)
- All Deans seemed to recognize the need for
educational initiatives on gender equity, but none has
taken specific steps to educate faculty in the particular
College or School on gender equity issues. (See Appendix
E, Report of Deans' Interviews, pp. 1-2)
- None of the Deans was averse to communication on
gender equity issues, and four of eleven Deans suggested
meetings in a variety of contexts (departmental, College,
and University) to discuss gender equity concerns. (See
Appendix E, Report of Deans' Interviews, p. 2)
- Some Deans preferred to wait for higher level
administrators to assume leadership in promulgating
gender equity initiatives. Others have not waited for
higher administration to act. (See Appendix E, Report of
Deans' Interviews, p. 2)
- Some Deans are awaiting the results of the Task Force
on Gender Equity study before they begin initiatives in
their own Colleges or Schools. (See Appendix E, Report of
Deans' Interviews, p. 2)
- Several Deans commented on the need for funding to
address gender-related salary disparities. (See Appendix
E, Report of Deans' Interviews, p. 2)
- Several Deans observed that the latest draft of the
University's Strategic Plan, as shared with them, does
not address gender equity issues. (See Appendix E, Report
of Deans' Interviews, p. 2)
- Several Deans commented that central administration
should offer a definition of gender equity that will
become part of the living culture of the University. (See
Appendix E, Report of Deans' Interviews, p. 2)
- In some Colleges, there are aggressive efforts to
recruit women and minority candidates. (See Appendix E,
Report of Deans' Interviews, p. 2)
- In some Colleges, there are mentoring programs which
facilitate progress toward promotion and tenure, as well
as mentoring programs to promote leadership abilities.
(See Appendix E, Report of Deans' Interviews, p. 2)
- Some Deans were pessimistic about the recruitment of
women and minorities. (See Appendix E, Report of Deans'
Interviews, p. 2)
- Many departments in male-dominated professions do not
have serious initiatives in place to seek and hire
qualified women candidates. The Deans who supervise these
departments are not encouraging departments to take such
initiatives. (See Appendix E, Report of Deans'
Interviews, p. 2)
- On the issue of advancement, Deans explained that
some Colleges or Schools elect Chairs and in others,
Chairs are appointed by the Dean. The Subcommittee notes
that in Colleges or Schools where Chairs are appointed, a
greater number of women faculty have served as Chairs.
The elective process could be disadvantageous for women
faculty who seek the position of Chair. The appointive
process seems to favor women's appointment as Chairs in
some Colleges or Schools. (See Appendix E, Report of
Deans' Interviews, pp. 2-3)
- Some Deans are positive about the prospects for women
faculty to advance to administrative positions or the
rank of Full Professor. They expressed concern that the
present small pool of women faculty are overextended in
terms of service work, and that this compromises their
ability to successfully pursue the research necessary for
promotion to the rank of Full Professor. (See Appendix E,
Report of Deans' Interviews, p. 3)
- Some Deans stated a need for standardized policies
and procedures in a number of key areas, including:
recruitment, mentoring, advancement in several areas
(promotion and tenure, promotion to Full Professor, and
administrative leadership) and salary equity. (See
Appendix E, Report of Deans' Interviews, pp. 3-4)
- Some Deans expressed the fear that the work of the
Task Force would be relegated to a shelf, becoming a
"dead letter." (See Appendix E, Report of Deans'
Interviews, p.4)
<
Task
Force on Gender Equity
Home
©2001
Marquette
University -- Last Update: January
31, 2001
|